What's New
Words of Wisdom
52
cards and 15 activities to spark conversations and make sense of learning.
Learn more HERE.
What We Do
The Firefly Group helps people make sense of what they learn and experience.
Whether facilitating a group for better decision-making, keynoting a conference, leading a training, or writing an instructional design, we use novel methods that engage, spark creativity, and produce memorable results.
If this sounds like a good direction for your organization, let's talk about how we might collaborate! Please give me a call (802.257.7247) or send an . - Brian
Your ETR (Estimated Time to Read): 10 minutes Your ETII (Estimated Time to Implement Ideas): 5 weeks |
November 2015
Say
It Quick |
Discoveries bits of serendipity to inspire and motivate |
Ideas fuel for your own continuous learning |
Activities tips and tricks you can try today |
Digitally Dumber | Humans are Underrated | Talk to Me |
The power of computers is growing ever stronger. Is your job safe? Even if you think you have nothing to worry about, it's time to refine the skills you have that are uniquely human. Learn more by beginning with this story in just 99 words.
Digitally Dumber
My wife has always sent her negatives to a lab for special processing, but this time she decided to try the digital self-service photo machine at Walgreens. She was trying to make a simple adjustment. Rotate the photo 90 degrees from landscape to portrait. But the machine wouldn't do this without cropping the top and bottom of our daughter's portrait leaving a weird slice of her nose and teeth. Even the store employees couldn't help. There simply were too few options on the simplified computer menu.By dumbing down computers we've actually made them harder to use!
Humans
are Underrated:
What High Achievers Know that Brilliant Machines Never Will
By Geoff Colvin
Only a few years ago, every photographer without their own darkroom sent negatives to a lab and waited days to receive what it took my wife minutes to do in the 99-Word Story. Yes, sometimes it's difficult to coax a computer to give the results you want. But the premise driving Geoff Colvin's book, Humans are Underrated, is that computers are able to perform more and more tasks better than people can thus making humans redundant - possibly. Colvin's solution? Capitalize on the abilities that humans will always accomplish better than machines. And he uses the bulk of his book to highlight those uniquely human abilities.
Colvin devotes about a third of his book to the advances of computing power in fields as diverse as engineering, medicine, law, the arts, and psychology. He describes the jobs that computers are able to do faster, better, or safer than humans like predicting the decisions of judges, diagnosing illnesses, cleaning up after a nuclear accident, writing fiction, painting a picture, or even determining a person's emotions.
He also talks about the ways in which technology actually inhibits our most human abilities or causes them to atrophy. In one study, people became unhappy and depressed in direct proportion to the time they spent on Facebook. They did not have a similar reaction with other screen-based activities.
Wired by our biology and our survival instincts, we are naturally inclined to connect with other people face-to-face. Our interpersonal skills, especially our ability to empathize and build relationships, are designed to facilitate social interactions. Meeting another person face-to-face, our brains actually synchronize. That synchronization is much less evident when we stand back-to-back and it's nonexistent on line where physical presence is absent and where gestures, expressions, and verbal signals are limited.
Colvin discusses
the advances made in our understanding of good interpersonal interactions
and describes how those skills are being refined by the military and, ironically,
by our work with computers. In this book you'll find solid advice about how
to improve your social skills on an individual level and for working in groups.
You'll learn why women have a natural advantage in outdoing computers on interpersonal
skills, and you may even be inspired to turn off your devices in favor of
face-to-face encounters.
Resources:
Colvin, Geoff, Humans are Underrated: What High Achievers Know that Brilliant Machines Never Will, Portfolio/Penguin, New York © 2015, ISBN: 978-1-59184-72-05.
If I Had a
Hammer
In the 99-Word Story, a computer that had been simplified became stupid. In
Geoff Colvin's book, more intelligent computers can make us more stupid.
How shall we reconcile these opposing views? Perhaps it really depends on how we use our computers. Like any tool, computers need to be matched to the task and the desired outcome. You could, possibly, use a hammer to attach two pieces of wood with a screw but it would be difficult. And you certainly wouldn't use a hammer to cut that piece of wood or to convince a colleague or your teenager of your point of view!
An important question which Colvin raises in his book is which functions do we really want computers doing? Just because a computer can do something, should it? He points out that we probably will never want computers to make decisions for us. We also won't want them to deliver bad news or invent a creative solution to an evolving problem. These are the things that humans do really well. We are most adept at bringing people together, motivating them, and building relationships that result in teams that are smarter than their individual members.
Unfortunately, some of the uses of on-line technology actually work against our development of these human skills. For example, my own ten minute research about Tinder, a social app that people use to enhance their dating prospects, confirms Colvin's assertion that technology can be a barrier to our most human abilities. A Vanity Fair article titled "Tinder and the Dawn of the Dating Apocalypse" notes that "…millennials brought up on social media are acutely anxious about intimacy. 'We don't know how to talk to each other face-to-face.'"
It's difficult to see how spending more time on line will make them any more adept at interpersonal relationships.
Just as computers are a tool that have their specific uses, our social skills of empathy, listening, innovation, creativity, storytelling, teambuilding, co-creativity, brainstorming, and cultural sensitivity might also be considered tools. Does it make sense to use a social networking app instead of the social networking skills that have been developed over several thousand years of human evolution?
By highlighting what computers do so well, Geoff Colvin's book challenges us to develop and refine what we do well as humans. And that's the value we can add that machines will never match.
Talk to Me
One of the important points of Geoff Colvin's book, Humans are Underrated,
is that the interpersonal skills that will stay of high value can be learned
and improved. He describes a group of sixth graders who clocked an average
of four and a half hours of screen time every day. This group scored low on
empathy skills. But with a week in the outdoors and the absence of electronic
devices, their empathy abilities improved.
Colvin says that we can improve our empathy and other executive functioning by getting to know another person or working with them to solve a problem. The following activity is designed to give people some of that practice and stretch their empathy muscles. Try it with your team then share your results with other readers.
Talk To Me
Materials: List of Situations, Modes of Communication handout, Pens
Time: 20 minutes
Participants: Any number working in pairs
Preparation:
Generate a list of situations in which two people need to communicate. Each situation should illustrate in a sentence or a short phrase a problem that needs to be resolved. Make sure there is variety in the degree of seriousness for the situations. Make your own list that is relevant to the group, ask the group to provide situations, or use the list below.Communication Situations:
- Communicate to your teenager about not being involved with controlled substances
- Communicate to a sales person about returning a defective product
- Communicate to a colleague about the importance of completing a project on time
- Communicate to your senior manager about revising a project timeline
- Communicate to your significant other about the need to lose weight
- Communicate to your best friend about plans for the weekend
- Communicate to a prospective client about a new product
- Communicate to your colleague about the poor performance of another worker
Make the Modes of Communication handout. It should have space for a list of situations in the left column and subsequent columns for different modes of communication. SAMPLE:
Modes of Communication
Situation Text Face-to-Face Phone Skype Other
Procedure:
Ask people to sit next to a partner and distribute a Modes of Communication handout to each person.Post the situations on a flipchart or project them on a screen. Give everyone about three minutes to work individually. Ask them to put a check in the column of the communication mode they would recommend for each situation.
Next, ask people to turn to their partner and compare the communication modes they chose for each situation. Encourage them to have a brief conversation about the assumptions each of them made as they completed their Communication Mode handout.
After seven or eight minutes, lead a discussion with the whole group beginning with some of the questions below.
Discussion:
- In which situations did you and your partner chose different modes of communication? How can you explain those differences?
- How much of your choice of communication was based on the situation and how much was based on the person you would be communicating with?
- Which communication modes are you most comfortable using and which do you think other people in the different situations would be most comfortable using?
- In which situations might you change your mode of communication after your initial "contact"?
- In which situations would you make a plan to use a variety of communication modes?
- How much consideration did you give to the communication needs or preferences of the other person in each situation?
- What is a situation in which you would have to rely on an electronic mode of communication even though you'd prefer to speak face-to-face? What could you do to maximize the use of your interpersonal skills in that situation?
- How might you communicate differently in these same situations if the person you were speaking to was different? (For example, talking to another person' teenager)
- How might you change your communication ideas after talking with your partner?
- Describe a situation in your own life when you would choose a less direct mode of communication.
- What have you learned from this activity that you can use in the future?
If you try this activity with your team,, please what happened and what you learned.
You can learn more about Elizabeth Newton's tapping study and the illusion of transparency at the links below.
Harvard Business Review
An excerpt from Made to Stick by Chip and Dan Heath
You Are Not So Smart, blog by David McRaney
If you like what you have read in this issue, I would like to bring the same innovation, creativity, and playfulness to your next meeting or learning event. Whether you need a keynote speaker, or help with strategic planning, performance improvement, or training facilitators and trainers in your organization, I look forward to your call (802.257.7247) or . -- Brian |
Read previous
issues. Click Library!
To add or delete your name to our mailing list, email
with a short note in the subject line.
I want this newsletter to be practical, succinct, and thoughtful. If you have suggestions about how I can meet these criteria, please let me know! Send me an with your thoughts and ideas.
Home
| Services | Products
| Mission | Ideas
| The Group | The
Buzz
(c)
2015 The Firefly Group